June 21 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS     print icon print

9-NEIL-ADDISON

St Margaret’s struggle for freedom

By Neil Addison

Glasgow has suddenly found itself in the front line of the defence of religious freedom in the UK. Two Glasgow Midwives are being taken to the Supreme Court over the issue of conscientious objection to abortion and the St Margaret’s Children and Family Care Society is being threatened with closure over its desire to provide every adoptive child with a mother and a father. Of the two cases that of St Margaret’s is the most worrying and potentially wide ranging since it calls into question the very existence of Faith based organisations operating in accordance with their conscience and beliefs.

As is well known the 10 Catholic adoption agencies in England and Wales suffered a crisis when the Sexual Orientation Regulations became law in 2007 because the SOR’s required them to be willing to provide adoption services to same sex couples.  Ultimately the SOR’s (now incorporated in the Equality Act 2010) led to the English and Welsh agencies either closing or severing their links with the Church. In Scotland, the St Andrew’s agency in Edinburgh has also severed its links and only the St Margaret’s agency in Glasgow has continued to operate in accordance with Catholic teaching giving preference to heterosexual married couples it is for this reason that it is being threatened with closure by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR).

St Margaret’s links with the Catholic Church are not merely nominal. In its 2011 annual report it had an income of £486,164 of which £51,000 comes as a grant from Glasgow and of Paisley Diocese with a further £51,937 from ‘crib donations’ arising from collections in parish churches. The Church therefore makes a substantial financial contribution to ensure that St Margaret’s is able to find parents for children. The agency has a particular skill in finding parents for ‘difficult to adopt’ children, those who are older or are physically or mentally handicapped and it is recognised as providing an outstandingly successful service.

The problem that St Margaret’s is having arises from its policy that prospective adoptive parents should be a husband and wife married for at least two years.  That policy has been described by OSCR as discriminatory against same sex couples and St Margaret’s has been threatened with removal from the Charity Register which would close it down.  This decision does not arise because of any complaint by any same-sex couple seeking to be parents, nor because of any failure by St Margaret’s to find appropriate parents for a child, it arises solely because of a complaint from the National Secular Society.

The decision by OSCR is being challenged St Margaret’s which is appealing to the Scottish Charity Appeals Panel in a case which could go through the Scottish Courts and end up in the Supreme Court. Besides the legal costs involved, the case is also absorbing the time and attention of St Margaret’s management and board distracting them from their core role of caring for children.

The basis of St Margaret’s defence is s193 of the Equality Act 2010 that exempts charities from non discrimination law if they are acting in accordance with the provisions of their constitution. This exemption for charities has existed since the very first Race Relations Act in 1968 and, for example, would allow a domestic violence charity to offer a refuge only to women or allow a HIV charity to offer medical services only to homosexuals

St Margaret’s Constitution states that it is established ‘to assess the suitability of applicants as adoptive parents all in accordance with the teachings of the Catholic Church’ and it is because of this that the agency wanted prospective parents to be married in accordance with Church teachings. The OSCR however, has decided that this means that that St Margaret’s is not providing ‘public benefit’ and therefore must be removed from the Charities Register. The reasoning by OSCR is a classic example of a circular argument. Since charities are permitted by s193 to discriminate, for OSCR to say that that the act of discrimination makes an organisation unfit to be a charity renders s193 meaningless.

What OSCR has completely failed to respect is the religious nature of St Margaret’s and the fact that its policies do not just apply to homosexuals but also to unmarried heterosexual couples. Also, the policy is based on what is the first choice of prospective parent it does not mean that in no circumstances whatsoever would St Margaret’s consider a single person or a same-sex couple but it puts the first priority on finding a married man and woman as the best choice for the child. So far St Margaret’s has always managed to find appropriate parents for the children referred to it which is a fact that OSCR has chosen to ignore in pursuit of its and the National Secular Society’s own ideological obsessions.

The consequences of the actions by OSCR are profound, as Brian McGuigan, who is a St Margaret’s trustee, said: “Our country is on the brink of declaring illegal the belief that every child where possible deserves a mother and father.”

The implications are also profound for all other religious based charities since none of them will be able to guarantee that their policies and principles are in accordance with their religious principles. The decision by OSCR also casts doubt on the assurances by both the Scottish and UK Governments that churches will not be obliged to perform same-sex ‘marriages.’ Based on what OSCR has done, any church that refused to perform same-sex ‘marriages’ could find its charitable status revoked or its trustees removed and replaced. The OSCR decision has implications not just in Scotland but also for charities in England and Wales.

St Margaret’s is involved in a very important struggle not just for Catholics but for everyone in the UK who believes in freedom.  Freedom to associate, Freedom to form independent organisations and charities is fundamental if democracy and freedom is to have any real meaning.

 

— By Neil Addison, a barrister,  who wrote Religious Discrimination and Hatred Law. Donations to St Margaret’s can be sent via www.stmargaretsadoption.org.uk

Leave a Reply

latest opinions

A parliament of promiscuity and sin

November 17th, 2017 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

Hugh Dougherty says politicians have done little to stop the...


Put down your phone and experience life

November 17th, 2017 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

PAUL CUDDIHY looks at our need to disconnect from our...


Weighing the scales at the year’s end

November 17th, 2017 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

As the nights drawn in, THE BOW IN THE HEAVENS...


Christ’s mercy touches society’s untouchables

November 10th, 2017 | comments icon 0 COMMENTS

In a letter from America, BRANDON MCGINLEY describes how he...



Social media

Latest edition

P1-NOV-17-2017

exclusively in the paper

  • The real story of Pope John Paul I mysterious death and his path to Cannonization
  • The history of Scotland’s powerful Cardinal Beaton
  • A new way forward for Catholics in Europe
  • The young Galloway Catholics campaigning against poverty

Previous editions

Previous editions of the Scottish Catholic Observer newspaper are only available to subscribed Members. To download previous editions of the paper, please subscribe.

note: registered members only.

Read the SCO